Hughes, J. (2016) ‘Genocide’
5 October 2020
Hughes, J. (2016) ‘Genocide’, in K. Cordell and S. Wolff, eds., The Routledge Handbook of Ethnic Conflict, 2. ed, London, Routledge, 122-139.
- Still no consensual definition of Genocide (‘G’), nor a reason able possibility of plausible prediction.
- Controversy as to whether G is a modern phenomenon or recurrent throughout history.
Definition
- R. Lemkin: formulated the concept of G in 1933, but coined it in 1944.
- GC was passed by the UNGA in Dec. 1948 and became international law in 1951.
- Employed in 1945 Nurnberg Trials.
- Humanitarian intervention emerged in the 1990s to constrain G (Blair, UK).
- Ethnic cleaning as a precursor or precipitant of genocide.
- Rome Statute establishing the International Criminal Court in 1998 incorporated the GC definition and established G as the most serious crime under its jurisdiction.
- 2004: UN Special Adviser on Prevention of Genocide: Juan E. Mendez (2004-7): Darfur is ‘genocide by attrition’ (127).
Causes
- Charismatic leaders and racist ideologies in a climate of violence.
- Structural (functional) approach vs. internationalist approach.
- Neumann and Arendt: totalitarian state connected with G – a crime of state (128).
- Relationship between G and modern state formation goes back historically to sixteenth century.
- Levine: systemic genocide occurs in societies undergoing systemic crisis and with an ideology of radical social transformation (129).
- Kuper: G is an ancient crime based on pervasive social cleavages in plural societies that become polarised into dominant and subordinate groups. Mass violence against whole communities can ensue.
- Intent must be organised and systematic, around an ideology of racial superiority concerned with ‘identity, purity sand security’ (Semelin 2007) (130): ‘Enemy within’.
- Nationalist ideologies stressing organic concept of state, people, culture, territory.
- Both structure and agency are important historically.
- Different stages: pre-genocide, genocide, post-genocide. When are individuals by-standers or perpetrators?
- G has been a recurrent feature of war since Antiquity (Thucydides, Melian Dialogue).
- G characterises ‘wars where ‘laws and norms’ of war have been refuted by one or the other party’ (131): relationship between military culture and G.
- ‘Threat perception’ by dominant group: ‘security dilemma’ focusing on other groups both within and across countries.
- Materialist rationales: land greed, conquest, forced seizure, settler colonialism.
- ‘…genocide is not a product of banality, but of extraordinary political, economic and social conditions” (135).